Skip to content

Praxis Core · Writing (5723) Selected Response

Written by AI · Not yet reviewed by staff

Praxis Core Research Skills Summary

Importance
★★★☆☆ (3 / 5)
Weight
About 6 of 40 Writing (5723) Selected Response questions (15%)

Judging the credibility and relevance of sources and recognizing the parts of a citation.

📖 See Research Skills concepts →

Research Skills: must-know points

  • A credible source has a qualified author, is current enough, and shows its evidence.
  • A primary source is a firsthand record; a secondary source explains or interprets it.
  • Know the parts of a citation: author, title, publisher or journal, date, and pages.

Research Skills: 7 sample questions

Practice questionReviewedWriting (5723) Selected Response › Research Skills★★★★☆

Question 1. A student is writing a report on the daily life of soldiers during the American Civil War. Which of the following is a primary source?

  1. ① A chapter in a modern history textbook
  2. ② A letter a soldier wrote to his family in 1863
  3. ③ An online encyclopedia article about the war
  4. ④ A biography of a general written by a historian
  5. ⑤ A documentary film made in 2010
▼ Show answer and explanation▲ Hide answer and explanation

Answer: ② A letter a soldier wrote to his family in 1863

Key point: A primary source is a firsthand record made at the time of the event.

A primary source is created by someone who was there, at the time. A letter written by a soldier during the war is a firsthand record. The others explain or interpret the war later, so they are secondary sources.

Wrong choices

  • "A chapter in a modern history textbook": A modern textbook summarizes events long afterward.
  • "An online encyclopedia article about the war": An encyclopedia article is a secondary summary.
  • "A biography of a general written by a historian": A biography by a historian interprets other sources.
  • "A documentary film made in 2010": A documentary made in 2010 is created long after the war.
Practice questionReviewedWriting (5723) Selected Response › Research Skills★★★★☆

Question 2. Which source would most likely give the most credible information about how well a new reading program works?

  1. ① A study published in a peer-reviewed education journal
  2. ② An advertisement from the company that sells the program
  3. ③ A comment posted on an anonymous online forum
  4. ④ A celebrity's social media post praising the program
  5. ⑤ A blog post by a parent who has not used the program
▼ Show answer and explanation▲ Hide answer and explanation

Answer: ① A study published in a peer-reviewed education journal

Key point: Credible sources have qualified authors, evidence, and expert review.

A peer-reviewed study is checked by other experts before it is published, and it shows its methods and data. That makes it the most credible choice.

Wrong choices

  • "An advertisement from the company that sells the program": The company has a reason to praise its own product.
  • "A comment posted on an anonymous online forum": An anonymous comment has no known author or evidence.
  • "A celebrity's social media post praising the program": A celebrity is not an expert on reading programs.
  • "A blog post by a parent who has not used the program": The writer has no direct experience or evidence.
Practice questionReviewedWriting (5723) Selected Response › Research Skills★★★☆☆

Question 3. In this book citation, what does "Harbor Press" identify? Lopez, Maria. Teaching Writing in Middle School. Harbor Press, 2019.

  1. ① The author
  2. ② The title
  3. ③ The publisher
  4. ④ The publication date
  5. ⑤ The page numbers
▼ Show answer and explanation▲ Hide answer and explanation

Answer: ③ The publisher

Key point: A book citation lists author, title, publisher, and date.

In a book citation, the name after the title is usually the publisher, the company that produced the book. Here the publisher is Harbor Press.

Wrong choices

  • "The author": The author is Maria Lopez, listed first.
  • "The title": The title is "Teaching Writing in Middle School."
  • "The publication date": The publication date is 2019.
  • "The page numbers": This citation gives no page numbers.
Practice questionReviewedWriting (5723) Selected Response › Research Skills★★★☆☆

Question 4. A student is writing a paper on how school start times affect teenagers' sleep. Which source is most relevant?

  1. ① An article about sleep medicines for older adults
  2. ② A history of the yellow school bus
  3. ③ A guide to healthy lunches for teenagers
  4. ④ A survey of how many hours teachers work each week
  5. ⑤ A study comparing students' sleep before and after their district moved to a later start time
▼ Show answer and explanation▲ Hide answer and explanation

Answer: ⑤ A study comparing students' sleep before and after their district moved to a later start time

Key point: A relevant source addresses the exact topic of the research question.

The paper is about start times and teenagers' sleep. Only the study that measures students' sleep before and after a later start time addresses both parts of the topic.

Wrong choices

  • "An article about sleep medicines for older adults": It is about sleep, but for older adults and medicine, not teenagers and start times.
  • "A history of the yellow school bus": The history of buses does not address sleep.
  • "A guide to healthy lunches for teenagers": Lunch is not related to start times or sleep.
  • "A survey of how many hours teachers work each week": Teachers' work hours do not measure students' sleep.
Practice questionReviewedWriting (5723) Selected Response › Research Skills★★★☆☆

Question 5. A student is researching how people lived in a small town in 1900. Which of the following is NOT a primary source?

  1. ① The diary of a woman who lived in the town
  2. ② A photograph of the town's main street taken in 1900
  3. ③ The text of a speech given by the town's mayor in 1900
  4. ④ A history textbook chapter written in 2015
  5. ⑤ The official 1900 census record for the town
▼ Show answer and explanation▲ Hide answer and explanation

Answer: ④ A history textbook chapter written in 2015

Key point: Secondary sources, like textbooks, interpret events afterward.

A history textbook written in 2015 was created long after 1900 by someone who was not there, so it is a secondary source. All the other items were made at the time by people who were there.

Wrong choices

  • "The diary of a woman who lived in the town": A diary is a firsthand record of the writer's life.
  • "A photograph of the town's main street taken in 1900": A photograph taken in 1900 records the scene at the time.
  • "The text of a speech given by the town's mayor in 1900": The speech was given at the time by a person who was there.
  • "The official 1900 census record for the town": A census record is an official record made at the time.
Practice questionReviewedWriting (5723) Selected Response › Research Skills★★★☆☆

Question 6. For a paper on how teenagers use smartphones today, a student finds a well-designed survey published in 2008 by a university research team. What is the main weakness of this source for the paper?

  1. ① The authors are not qualified researchers.
  2. ② It is too old to describe how teenagers use smartphones today.
  3. ③ It is a primary source, which cannot be used in a paper.
  4. ④ It must be biased because it comes from a university.
  5. ⑤ Surveys can never be used as evidence.
▼ Show answer and explanation▲ Hide answer and explanation

Answer: ② It is too old to describe how teenagers use smartphones today.

Key point: Check whether a source is current enough for the topic.

Technology and how people use it change quickly. A survey from 2008 cannot show how teenagers use smartphones today, even if it was well done.

Wrong choices

  • "The authors are not qualified researchers.": A university research team is a qualified author.
  • "It is a primary source, which cannot be used in a paper.": Primary sources such as survey data are often very useful in research.
  • "It must be biased because it comes from a university.": Being from a university does not make a source biased.
  • "Surveys can never be used as evidence.": Well-designed surveys are a common and accepted kind of evidence.
Practice questionReviewedWriting (5723) Selected Response › Research Skills★★★☆☆

Question 7. A study claims that a sports drink improves students' test scores. The study was paid for by the company that makes the drink. What is the best way for a researcher to treat this study?

  1. ① Note the possible conflict of interest and look for independent studies on the same question.
  2. ② Accept the results because a published study is always reliable.
  3. ③ Reject every study that any company has ever paid for.
  4. ④ Use the study only if the drink is sold in many stores.
  5. ⑤ Ignore the funding because it does not appear in the title.
▼ Show answer and explanation▲ Hide answer and explanation

Answer: ① Note the possible conflict of interest and look for independent studies on the same question.

Key point: Funding by an interested party may cause bias; check independent work.

When the company that profits from the result pays for a study, there may be a bias (a conflict of interest). This does not prove the study is wrong, so the best step is to note it and compare with independent research.

Wrong choices

  • "Accept the results because a published study is always reliable.": Being published does not guarantee that a study is reliable.
  • "Reject every study that any company has ever paid for.": Rejecting all company-funded studies is too extreme; funding is a reason to check, not proof of error.
  • "Use the study only if the drink is sold in many stores.": How widely the drink is sold says nothing about the study's quality.
  • "Ignore the funding because it does not appear in the title.": Funding matters wherever it is reported, not only in the title.

Test yourself.