Praxis Core · Writing (5723) Selected Response
Written by AI · Not yet reviewed by staffPraxis Core Research Skills Summary
- Importance
- ★★★☆☆ (3 / 5)
- Weight
- About 6 of 40 Writing (5723) Selected Response questions (15%)
Judging the credibility and relevance of sources and recognizing the parts of a citation.
📖 See Research Skills concepts →Research Skills: must-know points
- A credible source has a qualified author, is current enough, and shows its evidence.
- A primary source is a firsthand record; a secondary source explains or interprets it.
- Know the parts of a citation: author, title, publisher or journal, date, and pages.
Research Skills: 7 sample questions
Question 1. A student is writing a report on the daily life of soldiers during the American Civil War. Which of the following is a primary source?
- ① A chapter in a modern history textbook
- ② A letter a soldier wrote to his family in 1863
- ③ An online encyclopedia article about the war
- ④ A biography of a general written by a historian
- ⑤ A documentary film made in 2010
▼ Show answer and explanation▲ Hide answer and explanation
Answer: ② A letter a soldier wrote to his family in 1863
Key point: A primary source is a firsthand record made at the time of the event.
A primary source is created by someone who was there, at the time. A letter written by a soldier during the war is a firsthand record. The others explain or interpret the war later, so they are secondary sources.
Wrong choices
- "A chapter in a modern history textbook": A modern textbook summarizes events long afterward.
- "An online encyclopedia article about the war": An encyclopedia article is a secondary summary.
- "A biography of a general written by a historian": A biography by a historian interprets other sources.
- "A documentary film made in 2010": A documentary made in 2010 is created long after the war.
Question 2. Which source would most likely give the most credible information about how well a new reading program works?
- ① A study published in a peer-reviewed education journal
- ② An advertisement from the company that sells the program
- ③ A comment posted on an anonymous online forum
- ④ A celebrity's social media post praising the program
- ⑤ A blog post by a parent who has not used the program
▼ Show answer and explanation▲ Hide answer and explanation
Answer: ① A study published in a peer-reviewed education journal
Key point: Credible sources have qualified authors, evidence, and expert review.
A peer-reviewed study is checked by other experts before it is published, and it shows its methods and data. That makes it the most credible choice.
Wrong choices
- "An advertisement from the company that sells the program": The company has a reason to praise its own product.
- "A comment posted on an anonymous online forum": An anonymous comment has no known author or evidence.
- "A celebrity's social media post praising the program": A celebrity is not an expert on reading programs.
- "A blog post by a parent who has not used the program": The writer has no direct experience or evidence.
Question 3. In this book citation, what does "Harbor Press" identify? Lopez, Maria. Teaching Writing in Middle School. Harbor Press, 2019.
- ① The author
- ② The title
- ③ The publisher
- ④ The publication date
- ⑤ The page numbers
▼ Show answer and explanation▲ Hide answer and explanation
Answer: ③ The publisher
Key point: A book citation lists author, title, publisher, and date.
In a book citation, the name after the title is usually the publisher, the company that produced the book. Here the publisher is Harbor Press.
Wrong choices
- "The author": The author is Maria Lopez, listed first.
- "The title": The title is "Teaching Writing in Middle School."
- "The publication date": The publication date is 2019.
- "The page numbers": This citation gives no page numbers.
Question 4. A student is writing a paper on how school start times affect teenagers' sleep. Which source is most relevant?
- ① An article about sleep medicines for older adults
- ② A history of the yellow school bus
- ③ A guide to healthy lunches for teenagers
- ④ A survey of how many hours teachers work each week
- ⑤ A study comparing students' sleep before and after their district moved to a later start time
▼ Show answer and explanation▲ Hide answer and explanation
Answer: ⑤ A study comparing students' sleep before and after their district moved to a later start time
Key point: A relevant source addresses the exact topic of the research question.
The paper is about start times and teenagers' sleep. Only the study that measures students' sleep before and after a later start time addresses both parts of the topic.
Wrong choices
- "An article about sleep medicines for older adults": It is about sleep, but for older adults and medicine, not teenagers and start times.
- "A history of the yellow school bus": The history of buses does not address sleep.
- "A guide to healthy lunches for teenagers": Lunch is not related to start times or sleep.
- "A survey of how many hours teachers work each week": Teachers' work hours do not measure students' sleep.
Question 5. A student is researching how people lived in a small town in 1900. Which of the following is NOT a primary source?
- ① The diary of a woman who lived in the town
- ② A photograph of the town's main street taken in 1900
- ③ The text of a speech given by the town's mayor in 1900
- ④ A history textbook chapter written in 2015
- ⑤ The official 1900 census record for the town
▼ Show answer and explanation▲ Hide answer and explanation
Answer: ④ A history textbook chapter written in 2015
Key point: Secondary sources, like textbooks, interpret events afterward.
A history textbook written in 2015 was created long after 1900 by someone who was not there, so it is a secondary source. All the other items were made at the time by people who were there.
Wrong choices
- "The diary of a woman who lived in the town": A diary is a firsthand record of the writer's life.
- "A photograph of the town's main street taken in 1900": A photograph taken in 1900 records the scene at the time.
- "The text of a speech given by the town's mayor in 1900": The speech was given at the time by a person who was there.
- "The official 1900 census record for the town": A census record is an official record made at the time.
Question 6. For a paper on how teenagers use smartphones today, a student finds a well-designed survey published in 2008 by a university research team. What is the main weakness of this source for the paper?
- ① The authors are not qualified researchers.
- ② It is too old to describe how teenagers use smartphones today.
- ③ It is a primary source, which cannot be used in a paper.
- ④ It must be biased because it comes from a university.
- ⑤ Surveys can never be used as evidence.
▼ Show answer and explanation▲ Hide answer and explanation
Answer: ② It is too old to describe how teenagers use smartphones today.
Key point: Check whether a source is current enough for the topic.
Technology and how people use it change quickly. A survey from 2008 cannot show how teenagers use smartphones today, even if it was well done.
Wrong choices
- "The authors are not qualified researchers.": A university research team is a qualified author.
- "It is a primary source, which cannot be used in a paper.": Primary sources such as survey data are often very useful in research.
- "It must be biased because it comes from a university.": Being from a university does not make a source biased.
- "Surveys can never be used as evidence.": Well-designed surveys are a common and accepted kind of evidence.
Question 7. A study claims that a sports drink improves students' test scores. The study was paid for by the company that makes the drink. What is the best way for a researcher to treat this study?
- ① Note the possible conflict of interest and look for independent studies on the same question.
- ② Accept the results because a published study is always reliable.
- ③ Reject every study that any company has ever paid for.
- ④ Use the study only if the drink is sold in many stores.
- ⑤ Ignore the funding because it does not appear in the title.
▼ Show answer and explanation▲ Hide answer and explanation
Answer: ① Note the possible conflict of interest and look for independent studies on the same question.
Key point: Funding by an interested party may cause bias; check independent work.
When the company that profits from the result pays for a study, there may be a bias (a conflict of interest). This does not prove the study is wrong, so the best step is to note it and compare with independent research.
Wrong choices
- "Accept the results because a published study is always reliable.": Being published does not guarantee that a study is reliable.
- "Reject every study that any company has ever paid for.": Rejecting all company-funded studies is too extreme; funding is a reason to check, not proof of error.
- "Use the study only if the drink is sold in many stores.": How widely the drink is sold says nothing about the study's quality.
- "Ignore the funding because it does not appear in the title.": Funding matters wherever it is reported, not only in the title.
Test yourself.